University of North Georgia

Dahlonega, GA

FY 2023-24 fragility

/ 100

high

Composite Fragility Score over time

Pillar trajectories

Operating Margin

(Operating revenue − operating expenses) / operating revenue. Industry-standard debt-rating heuristics — Fitch-style bands for privates, Moody's-aligned for publics. Score reflects current year and 3-year rolling average — single positive years don't erase chronic distress.

Amber dot = unusual single-year shift; smoothed metric attenuates impact. Hover for context.

Pricing Power

Real net tuition revenue per FTE, 5-year change. Falling real net tuition + rising discount rate = market rejection of value proposition. Discount rate is the all-student institutional rate (F2C05 + F2C06 funded + unfunded grants over gross tuition); schools typically publish a first-time-in-college rate which runs 5-10 points higher.

Debt Burden

Viability ratio (expendable net assets / plant debt) with debt-acceleration penalty. Catches schools whose covenants are at risk because of recent debt issuance.

Amber dot = unusual single-year shift; smoothed metric attenuates impact. Hover for context.

Liquidity

Days cash on hand. Tuition-collapse override prevents 'deathbed cash' from misleading the score (high cash from emergency relief while school is shrinking).

Amber dot = unusual single-year shift; smoothed metric attenuates impact. Hover for context.

Institutional debt per student

Total institutional long-term debt (not student loans) divided by full-time-equivalent enrollment, nominal dollars. For public-university systems with centralized bond debt (UC, FL SUS), the system pool is allocated across sibling campuses proportional to FTE.

Long-term debt per FTE student · FY 2023-24

$7,092

$104.2M total debt ÷ 14,698 FTE

IPEDS-reported debt / FTE · trend

▼ 0% since FY 2013-14 ($0)

Latest-year debt per FTE student includes IPEDS-reported plant debt plus the LLM-enriched DSO snapshot (off-balance-sheet bonds at affiliated entities — typically FY 2024 audit values). For University System of Georgia, the system bond pool is the sum of all sibling campuses’ DSO_DEBT_SYSTEM values, allocated to this campus by FTE share — not attributed entirely to the flagship UNITID. The trajectory line shows IPEDS-reported debt only (no DSO) for consistency across years — DSO is a single audit-year snapshot, not a time series.

Athletics & enrollment

Share of undergrads who play varsity sports (EADA, U.S. Dept of Education). A rising ratio over time at a tuition-dependent private is the “athletic ratchet” — adding sports or expanding rosters to fill seats as enrollment pressure mounts. Snapshots taken at ~6-year intervals.

Varsity athletes as reported · AY 2024-25

1.8%

223 athletes ÷ 12,134 UG
NCAA Division II without football

% athletes · trend (3 snapshots)

▼ 0.3 pts since AY 2013-14 (2.1%)

Coaching footprint · AY 2024-25

12 head + 12 assistant = 24 total

1 coach per 9.3 reported athletes

Typical varsity-only programs run 6–10 athletes per coach. Ratios well below that often reveal off-roster recruiting pools (JV, developmental, club with serious recruiting) that don’t show up in EADA’s varsity headcount.

What EADA counts: a student who participated in at least one intercollegiate (varsity) competition during the academic year. Excludes redshirts, JV / developmental rosters, and club sports. The actual athletic-recruit footprint can be substantially larger than this count. At D3 schools, “athletic aid” reads $0 in EADA because institutional merit aid that functions as recruitment subsidy isn’t classified as athletic aid — so the discount-rate signal on this page is the right place to look for that money.

Peer-anchored estimated total athletes

1.5%

≈ 182 implied athletes ÷ 12,134 UG
vs 1.8% reported (223)
kept-peer range suggests 1–2% (166–205 athletes)

roughly in line with peer expectations

Algorithmic peers · trimmed mean 7.6:1 (kept range 6.9:1–8.5:1)

Peer	UG	Ratio
Western Washington UniversityWA	12,343	6.9:1
California State University-ChicoCA	12,386	7.3:1
California State University-San MarcosCA(trimmed)	12,447	11.6:1
California State University-San BernardinoCA	12,518	8.5:1
CUNY Queens CollegeNY(trimmed)	9,918	1.8:1

Peers chosen by similarity score: same control + NCAA division weighted highest, plus Carnegie classification and UG enrollment band. The highest and lowest peer ratios are trimmed before averaging so one outlier doesn’t shift the range; the implied range is the school’s coach count multiplied by the kept peers’ min and max ratios, capped at UG enrollment.

Administrative spending

Institutional Support (administration) measured two ways, from IPEDS expense-by-function reporting: as a share of total operating expenses alongside Instruction (faculty/teaching), and indexed against net tuition revenue to show whether admin spending tracks the revenue that funds it.

Admin: 8.2% → 6.9% · Instruction: 36.8% → 32.8%

Instruction and Institutional Support as a share of total operating expenses. Instruction is the IPEDS faculty/teaching proxy; Institutional Support is the administrative proxy (executive management, finance, HR, general admin). A narrowing gap means admin is gaining on teaching.

Student-to-admin ratio · AY 2023-24

50.5:1

14,698 student FTE ÷ 291 full-time admin

Carnegie reference

Not enough peer schools in this Carnegie classification to compute a meaningful reference.

What “admin” means here: Management (OCCUPCAT 300) + Business and Financial Operations (OCCUPCAT 310) full-time staff — the “decision-making admin” headcount. Source: IPEDS S2023_OC survey (Fall 2023). This is a headcount metric, not a dollar metric, so it isn’t contaminated by regional salary differences. Not part of the fragility score; surfaced as descriptive context only.

Program earnings outcomes

From the HEA Group’s January 2026 release of program-level earnings data used in AHEAD negotiations. Each tested program is checked against a same-state high-school-graduate earnings benchmark; programs also subject to OBBBA Gainful Employment lose Title IV eligibility on a fail and are flagged AT RISK.

Earnings by Program

Median earnings 4 years post-completion vs the earnings benchmark.

Benchmark

$32,203

GA HS-only median

Computer and Information Sciences General
Bachelor · 78 completers in earnings cohort
PASS +59K
Registered Nursing Nursing Administration Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing
Bachelor · 210 completers in earnings cohort
PASS +50K
Information Science/Studies
Bachelor · 39 completers in earnings cohort
PASS +46K
Mathematics
Bachelor · 21 completers in earnings cohort
PASS +41K
Accounting and Related Services
Bachelor · 116 completers in earnings cohort
PASS +38K

Source: HEA Group Jan 2026 release using AHEAD-negotiations data. Pooled 2017-18 + 2018-19 completer cohorts; earnings measured CY 2022-23, inflation-adjusted to 2024 (CPI-U). Only programs with sufficient Title-IV completers appear in the test. “AT RISK” = fails the OBBBA Gainful Employment threshold — loss of Title IV eligibility likely, program likely closes.

Latest-year breakdown (FY 2023-24)

Pillar	Raw Metric	Score
Operating Margin	23.8%	5 / 25
Pricing Power	$4,618 real net tuition / FTE	25 / 25
Debt Burden	0.65 viability ratio	18 / 25
Liquidity	83 days cash on hand	16 / 25

Peer schools

Closest by Fragility Score in FY 2023-24. Financial similarity only — geographic / regional clustering is a separate (future) feature.

Less fragile

Schools scoring below

More fragile

Schools scoring above

Selected raw financials — FY 2023-24

GASB / IPEDS Finance F1A. DSO totals from LLM enrichment of audited financial statements; see /sources for citations.

Total revenue (F1B27)

$265.0M

Total expenses (F1C191)

$279.1M

Net tuition revenue (F1B01)

$67.3M

Auxiliary enterprises revenue (F1B05)

$34.7M

State appropriations (F1B11)

$109.0M

Endowment EOY (F1H02)

$85.1M

Long-term debt (F1A10)

$104.2M

Expendable net position (F1N05)

$67.6M

Interest expense (F1C19IN)

$4.8M

DSO debt — campus-specific

—

DSO debt — system-level pool

—