Orbuculumbeta

Milligan University

Milligan, TN
FY 2023-24 fragility
40
/ 100
moderate

Composite Fragility Score over time

Pillar trajectories

Operating Margin
(Operating revenue − operating expenses) / operating revenue. Industry-standard debt-rating heuristics — Fitch-style bands for privates, Moody's-aligned for publics. Score reflects current year and 3-year rolling average — single positive years don't erase chronic distress.
Amber dot = unusual single-year shift; smoothed metric attenuates impact. Hover for context.
Pricing Power
Real net tuition revenue per FTE, 5-year change. Falling real net tuition + rising discount rate = market rejection of value proposition. Discount rate is the all-student institutional rate (F2C05 + F2C06 funded + unfunded grants over gross tuition); schools typically publish a first-time-in-college rate which runs 5-10 points higher.
Debt Burden
Viability ratio (expendable net assets / plant debt) with debt-acceleration penalty. Catches schools whose covenants are at risk because of recent debt issuance.
Amber dot = unusual single-year shift; smoothed metric attenuates impact. Hover for context.
Liquidity
Days cash on hand. Tuition-collapse override prevents 'deathbed cash' from misleading the score (high cash from emergency relief while school is shrinking).
Amber dot = unusual single-year shift; smoothed metric attenuates impact. Hover for context.

Institutional debt per student

Total institutional long-term debt (not student loans) divided by full-time-equivalent enrollment, nominal dollars. For public-university systems with centralized bond debt (UC, FL SUS), the system pool is allocated across sibling campuses proportional to FTE.

Long-term debt per FTE student · FY 2023-24
$6,010
$6.9M total debt ÷ 1,155 FTE
IPEDS-reported debt / FTE · trend
46% since FY 2015-16 ($11,114)

Latest-year debt per FTE student includes IPEDS-reported plant debt plus the LLM-enriched DSO snapshot (off-balance-sheet bonds at affiliated entities — typically FY 2024 audit values). For schools in public systems not yet in our curated map (CSU, UT, TAMUS, etc.), the system pool is currently attributed entirely to the flagship campus per the dedupe pass; per-student numbers at those flagships are overstated until allocation is added. The trajectory line shows IPEDS-reported debt only (no DSO) for consistency across years — DSO is a single audit-year snapshot, not a time series.

Tuition discount rate

The share of gross tuition revenue that’s offset by institutional grant aid (scholarships funded from the operating budget plus endowed scholarships). A rising discount rate combined with falling real net tuition is the canonical signal that a school is buying enrollment with aid that the market won’t support.

Tuition discount rate · FY 2023-24
53.1%
$19.7M institutional aid ÷ $37.2M gross tuition
Discount rate · trend
8.8 pts since FY 2014-15 (44.2%)

Institutional grant aid (F2C05 funded + F2C06 unfunded) divided by gross tuition revenue (F2D01 net tuition + grants). This is the all-student, institution-wide rate. Schools and NACUBO typically publish a first-time-in-college (FTIC) freshman rate, which runs 5–10 points higher because recruitment merit aid is front-loaded onto incoming classes and steps down for upperclassmen.

Athletics & enrollment

Share of undergrads who play varsity sports (EADA, U.S. Dept of Education). A rising ratio over time at a tuition-dependent private is the “athletic ratchet” — adding sports or expanding rosters to fill seats as enrollment pressure mounts. Snapshots taken at ~6-year intervals.

Varsity athletes as reported · AY 2024-25
72.2%
586 athletes ÷ 812 UG
NAIA Division II
% athletes · trend (3 snapshots)
37.6 pts since AY 2017-18 (34.6%)
Coaching footprint · AY 2024-25
21 head + 49 assistant = 70 total
1 coach per 8.4 reported athletes
Typical varsity-only programs run 6–10 athletes per coach. Ratios well below that often reveal off-roster recruiting pools (JV, developmental, club with serious recruiting) that don’t show up in EADA’s varsity headcount.

What EADA counts: a student who participated in at least one intercollegiate (varsity) competition during the academic year. Excludes redshirts, JV / developmental rosters, and club sports. The actual athletic-recruit footprint can be substantially larger than this count. At D3 schools, “athletic aid” reads $0 in EADA because institutional merit aid that functions as recruitment subsidy isn’t classified as athletic aid — so the discount-rate signal on this page is the right place to look for that money.

Peer-anchored estimated total athletes
100.0%
812 implied athletes ÷ 812 UG
vs 72.2% reported (586)
kept-peer range suggests 77100% (626–812 athletes)
range capped at UG enrollment (812) — raw upper bound exceeded the physical ceiling
roughly in line with peer expectations
Algorithmic peers · trimmed mean 11.6:1 (kept range 8.9:116.1:1)
PeerUGRatio
Culver-Stockton CollegeMO77916.1:1
Hastings CollegeNE8909.8:1
Bryan College-DaytonTN(trimmed)72222.2:1
Bethel UniversityIN9518.9:1
Northwest UniversityWA(trimmed)6255.2:1

Peers chosen by similarity score: same control + NCAA division weighted highest, plus Carnegie classification and UG enrollment band. The highest and lowest peer ratios are trimmed before averaging so one outlier doesn’t shift the range; the implied range is the school’s coach count multiplied by the kept peers’ min and max ratios, capped at UG enrollment.

Administrative spending

Institutional Support (administration) measured two ways, from IPEDS expense-by-function reporting: as a share of total operating expenses alongside Instruction (faculty/teaching), and indexed against net tuition revenue to show whether admin spending tracks the revenue that funds it.

Admin: 25.4% → 22.8% · Instruction: 33.6% → 36.0%

Instruction and Institutional Support as a share of total operating expenses. Instruction is the IPEDS faculty/teaching proxy; Institutional Support is the administrative proxy (executive management, finance, HR, general admin). A narrowing gap means admin is gaining on teaching.

Student-to-admin ratio · AY 2023-24
34.0:1
1,155 student FTE ÷ 34 full-time admin
26% below Carnegie peer average — more admin-dense than peers
Carnegie reference
45.8:1
Baccalaureate (Diverse Fields) · n=300
Mean students-per-admin across schools in the same Carnegie classification (target excluded). Higher means leaner administrative footprint.

What “admin” means here: Management (OCCUPCAT 300) + Business and Financial Operations (OCCUPCAT 310) full-time staff — the “decision-making admin” headcount. Source: IPEDS S2023_OC survey (Fall 2023). This is a headcount metric, not a dollar metric, so it isn’t contaminated by regional salary differences. Not part of the fragility score; surfaced as descriptive context only.

Latest-year breakdown (FY 2023-24)

PillarRaw MetricScore
Operating Margin6.4%15 / 25
Pricing Power$15,125 real net tuition / FTE25 / 25
Debt Burden5.80 viability ratio0 / 25
Liquidity453 days cash on hand0 / 25

Peer schools

Closest by Fragility Score in FY 2023-24. Financial similarity only — geographic / regional clustering is a separate (future) feature.

Selected raw financials — FY 2023-24

FASB / IPEDS Finance F2.

Total revenue (F2B01)
$41.8M
Total expenses (F2B02)
$32.4M
Net tuition revenue (F2D01)
$17.5M
Endowment EOY (F2H02)
$56.2M
Plant debt (F2I06 / F2A03A)
$6.9M
Expendable net assets (F2I05)
$40.2M
Interest expense (F2E136)
$218K
Depreciation (F2E135)
$2.4M